|
|
Post by grezzo16 on Feb 19, 2009 17:38:48 GMT
RESOLVED BECAUSE EACH QUESTIONS RECEIVED AN ANSWER
hi to everyone
first of all i would say THANK YOU to the people who made this thing possible: continue developing Tyrian game.
Now the point:
i've just discovered the opening of a new branch called OpenTyrian2000, that probably aims to bring episode 5 and other things in opentyrian universe: that's FANTASTIC!
now, what to do you think to write in the chages (revision) WHAT branch is affected?
i know the differences between revision and version, but i think something like (CLASSIC), (ENHANCED), (2000) before the change description, could be done.
just to make it clear for who looks at that page.
and now my questions:
1= is the opentyrian2000 branch based on classic version? or it is just a separate branch?
2= i know alexander and tisselian are working on the tyrian2000 branch, but they are the ONLY or the whole team (as it results form google code home page) work for the entire set of branches?
3= are you gonna release or host the tyrian2000 datafiles?
4= are you gonna to build binary+datafiles packs and give them a VERSION number?
thanks!
|
|
|
|
Post by alexander on Feb 20, 2009 18:01:01 GMT
Now the point: i've just discovered the opening of a new branch called OpenTyrian2000, that probably aims to bring episode 5 and other things in opentyrian universe: that's FANTASTIC! --- and if you want to lend a hand, you're more than welcome. now, what to do you think to write in the chages (revision) WHAT branch is affected?i know the differences between revision and version, but i think something like ( CLASSIC), (ENHANCED), (2000) before the change description, could be done. It is just a matter of prepending any string you want to the comment and it has to be done by hand. As far as I am concerned, no problem in doing that. and now my questions: 1= is the opentyrian2000 branch based on classic version? or it is just a separate branch?2= i know alexander and tisselian are working on the tyrian2000 branch, but they are the ONLY or the whole team (as it results form google code home page) work for the entire set of branches?3= are you gonna release or host the tyrian2000 datafiles?4= are you gonna to build binary+datafiles packs and give them a VERSION number?thanks! 1. it is based on the classic version. 2. Assuming that you were asking who are the members of the developer team working on the 2k branch, the answer is me and tisselian. 3. Once the port will be ready , maybe. Still , it's a bit too early to tell. 4. No. Building a binary is rather straightforward, at least as far as I can see under Linux. As far as version numbers go, I honestly can't see the point : svn revisions already define a nonambiguous timeline. |
|
|
|
Post by tisselian on Feb 20, 2009 20:41:36 GMT
and now my questions: 1= is the opentyrian2000 branch based on classic version? or it is just a separate branch?2= i know alexander and tisselian are working on the tyrian2000 branch, but they are the ONLY or the whole team (as it results form google code home page) work for the entire set of branches?3= are you gonna release or host the tyrian2000 datafiles?4= are you gonna to build binary+datafiles packs and give them a VERSION number?thanks! 1. it is based on the classic version. 2. Assuming that you were asking who are the members of the developer team working on the 2k branch, the answer is me and tisselian. 3. Once the port will be ready , maybe. Still , it's a bit too early to tell. 4. No. Building a binary is rather straightforward, at least as far as I can see under Linux. As far as version numbers go, I honestly can't see the point : svn revisions already define a nonambiguous timeline. hi grezzo16, i can only quote alexander  : 1. it is an adaptation derived from opentyrian classic source 2. at this moment we are the ones taking care of that branch 3. there are still some problems of compatibility of the source code with different data files which must be faced before releasing a "mixed" datapack 4. SVN is ok to cope with revision numbers and there is no need of adding an additional enumeration |
|
|
|
Post by grezzo16 on Mar 4, 2009 22:57:33 GMT
hi to everyone
thanks for the replies.
I would like to help but i've not programming skills and not so much time to spend on OT.
Maybe a Section called "Report Bugs" will be useful.
|
|
|
|
Post by yuriks on Mar 5, 2009 1:43:10 GMT
hi to everyone thanks for the replies. I would like to help but i've not programming skills and not so much time to spend on OT. Maybe a Section called "Report Bugs" will be useful. Uh... |
|
|
|
Post by grezzo16 on Mar 5, 2009 8:35:53 GMT
as i said to mindless, this method is IN MY OPINION not good, because people can't discuss/talk about the bug and ask about occurency of the bug, etc...
|
|
|
|
Post by hurleybird on Mar 5, 2009 8:43:10 GMT
Yes they can. Click on an issue, write a message.
|
|
|
|
Post by grezzo16 on Mar 5, 2009 8:48:41 GMT
oh damn what a NOOB (talking about myself)
accept all my apologises.
thanks hurleybird
|
|
|
|
Post by dinth on Mar 20, 2009 14:19:51 GMT
So if OpenTyrian2000 will be the same to Tyrian 2000, as OpenTyrian Classic to orginal Tyrian, will OpenTyrian Enhanced contain everything from OpenTyrian2000?
If yes, OpenTyrian Enhanced should change his name to OpenTyrian2000 Enhanced
PS. Sory for my bad english
|
|
|
|
Post by yuriks on Mar 20, 2009 15:05:24 GMT
I don't think Enhanced will be getting 2k support, at least not yet. I may (or may not) switch to generic game file formats which will make a conversion of the 2k data to work in Enhanced possible, so a converter is something to keep in mind.
|
|
|
|
Post by grezzo16 on Mar 20, 2009 16:47:00 GMT
i'm so excited to see a stable/playable release of OpenTyrian2000...
thanks for you efforts guys!
EDIT: i've recently discovered tha real purpose of the enhanced edition and i MUST support your purpose.
Thanks !
|
|
:
